The Relation of Calculated Plasma Volume Status to Sublingual Microcirculatory Blood Flow and Organ Injury.

BACKGROUND: The calculated plasma volume status (cPVS) was validated as a surrogate of intravascular filling. The aim of this study is to assess the cPVS in relation to sublingual perfusion and organ injury. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative cPVS were obtained by determining the actual and ideal plasma volume levels in surgical patients. The sublingual microcirculation was assessed using SDF imaging, and we determined the De Backer score, the Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (Consensus PPV), and the Consensus PPV (small). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the distribution of cPVS and its association with intraoperative sublingual microcirculation and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The median pre- and postoperative cPVS were -7.25% (IQR -14.29--1.88) and -0.4% (IQR -5.43-6.06), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean intraoperative administered fluid volume was 2.5 ± 2.5 L (1.14 L h-1). No statistically significant correlation was observed between the pre- or postoperative cPVS and sublingual microcirculation variables. Higher preoperative (OR = 1.04, p = 0.098) and postoperative cPVS (OR = 1.057, p = 0.029) were associated with postoperative organ injury and complications (sepsis (30%), anemia (24%), respiratory failure (13%), acute kidney injury (6%), hypotension (6%), stroke (3%)). CONCLUSIONS: The calculated PVS was associated with an increased risk of organ injury and complications in this cohort.

Association between mean arterial pressure and sublingual microcirculation during major non-cardiac surgery: Post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is an association between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and sublingual perfusion during major surgery, and perhaps an identifiable harm threshold. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort included patients who had elective major non-cardiac surgery with a duration of ≥2 h under general anesthesia. We assessed sublingual microcirculation every 30 min using SDF+ imaging and determined the De Backer score, Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (Consensus PPV), and the Consensus PPV (small). Our primary outcome was the relationship between MAP and sublingual perfusion which was evaluated with linear mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included, with MAP ranging between 65 mmHg and 120 mmHg during anesthesia and surgery. Over a range of intraoperative MAPs between 65 and 120 mmHg, there were no meaningful associations between blood pressure and various measures of sublingual perfusion. There were also no meaningful changes in microcirculatory flow over 4.5 h of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients having elective major non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia, sublingual microcirculation is well maintained when MAP ranges between 65 and 120 mmHg. It remains possible that sublingual perfusion will be a useful marker of tissue perfusion when MAP is lower than 65 mmHg.

Association of Preoperative Basal Inflammatory State, Measured by Plasma suPAR Levels, with Intraoperative Sublingual Microvascular Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery.

It remains unknown whether chronic systemic inflammation is associated with impaired microvascular perfusion during surgery. We evaluated the association between the preoperative basal inflammatory state, measured by plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels, and intraoperative sublingual microcirculatory variables in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. Plasma suPAR levels were determined in 100 non-cardiac surgery patients using the suPARnostic® quick triage lateral flow assay. We assessed sublingual microcirculation before surgical incision and every 30 min during surgery using Sidestream Darkfield (SDF+) imaging and determined the De Backer score, the Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (Consensus PPV), and the Consensus PPV (small). Elevated suPAR levels were associated with lower intraoperative De Backer score, Consensus PPV, and Consensus PPV (small). For each ng mL−1 increase in suPAR, De Backer score, Consensus PPV, and Consensus PPV (small) decreased by 0.7 mm−1, 2.5%, and 2.8%, respectively, compared to baseline. In contrast, CRP was not significantly correlated with De Backer score (r = −0.034, p = 0.36), Consensus PPV (r = −0.014, p = 0.72) or Consensus PPV Small (r = −0.037, p = 0.32). Postoperative De Backer score did not change significantly from baseline (5.95 ± 3.21 vs. 5.89 ± 3.36, p = 0.404), while postoperative Consensus PPV (83.49 ± 11.5 vs. 81.15 ± 11.8, p < 0.001) and Consensus PPV (small) (80.87 ± 13.4 vs. 78.72 ± 13, p < 0.001) decreased significantly from baseline. In conclusion, elevated preoperative suPAR levels were associated with intraoperative impairment of sublingual microvascular perfusion in patients undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery.

Elevated preoperative suPAR is a strong and independent risk marker for postoperative complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery (SPARSE).

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major surgery are often at risk of developing postoperative complications. We investigated whether a preoperative marker of chronic inflammation, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, can aid in identifying patients at high risk for postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. METHODS: In this prospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03851965), EDTA blood was collected from consecutive adult White patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery with expected duration ≥2 hours under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to IV. Plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels were determined using the suPARnostic quick triage lateral flow assay. The primary endpoint was postoperative complications defined as presence of any complication and/or admission to intensive care unit and/or mortality within the first 90 postoperative days. RESULTS: Preoperative soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor had an odds ratio of 1.50 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-1.82) for every ng/mL increase. When including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, C-reactive protein, and grouped soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in multivariate analysis, patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor between 5.5 and 10 ng/mL had an odds ratio of 11.2 (confidence interval: 3.1-40.8) and patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor >10 ng/mL had an odds ratio of 19.9 (95% confidence interval: 4.3-92.9) compared to patients with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor ≤5.5 ng/mL, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor showed an area under the curve of 0.82 (confidence interval: 0.72-0.91). Receiver operating characteristic analysis combining age, sex, C-reactive protein levels, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score and had an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.82). Adding soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor to this model increased the area under the curve to 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.92) (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Preoperative soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor provided strong and independent predictive value on postoperative complications in White patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.

Critical emergency medicine and the resuscitative care unit.

Critical emergency medicine is the medical field concerned with management of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED). Increased ED stay due to intensive care unit (ICU) overcrowding has a negative impact on patient care and outcome. It has been proposed that implementation of critical care services in the ED can negate this effect. Two main Critical Emergency Medicine models have been proposed, the "resource intensivist" and "ED-ICU" models. The resource intensivist model is based on constant presence of an intensivist in the traditional ED setting, while the ED-ICU model encompasses the notion of a separate ED-based unit, with monitoring and therapeutic capabilities similar to those of an ICU. Critical emergency medicine has the potential to improve patient care and outcome; however, establishment of evidence-based protocols and a multidisciplinary approach in patient management are of major importance.